CIE 0522 COURSEWORK

CIE concluded that the grading was carried out appropriately, although they anticipate making some further refinements to their awarding this summer, as is standard practice for exam boards. Try opening the logs in a new window. The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than in , but there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the award beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence. Sign in or sign up. Explore the topic Key stage 3 and 4 exam marking, qualifications and results Exam regulation and administration. Maybe Yes this page is useful No this page is not useful Is there anything wrong with this page?

It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use. Your donations keep this site and others like it running Donate now. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. WhatDoTheyKnow also publishes and archives requests and responses, building a massive archive of information. CIE also has a substantial November entry. Sign in or sign up.

The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than inbut there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the award beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence.

UK courework cookies to make the site simpler.

Other papers had more marks between A and C. Donate and support our work. They make grading decisions more difficult, as a change of just one mark can affect a significant proportion of students. Thank you for your feedback.

  CASE STUDY E CHOUPAL PPT

Igcse english coursework mark scheme – Google Docs

There was also a substantial overseas entry for WhatDoTheyKnow also publishes and archives requests and responses, building a massive archive of information. Innearlystudents tookcompared to 17, taking Run by Volunteers and powered by Alaveteli. The request was successful. In response to those concerns, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July. Share this page Share on Facebook Share on Twitter.

We concluded there was no case to re-open the award. We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account.

cie 0522 coursework

cis For example on Paper 3 there were 10 marks between the boundary marks for A and C and on the coursework component there were 12 marks between A and C. While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Paper 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe.

cie 0522 coursework

Summer As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. What were you doing?

Maybe Yes this page is useful No this page is not useful Is there anything wrong with this page? PDFKB9 pages. We concluded that, in the circumstances, CIE made appropriate grading decisions.

CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer 2015

Skip to main content. Grade Boundaries University of Cambridge. If you have received this email in error, please let us know and then delete the original emails and any attachments. Any dissemination or copying of this email or attachments is strictly prohibited unless you are the intended recipient or are responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient. For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards.

  BU MAMS PERSONAL STATEMENT

Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Cambridge Assessment or OCR unless specifically stated.

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page? CIE did tighten their courework at C and, to a lesser extent, at A. CIE also has a substantial November entry.

IGCSE English First Language – 0522 – Grade Boundaries

Reviews of summer awarding Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were unhappy with their results. Looking for an EU Authority? Write to your politician. They also mean that papers do not differentiate between students as intended. UK entries for are far higher than for because only is approved by the Department for Education for use in maintained schools.

Request an accessible format.